Assessment in senior cycle takes different forms and is used for a variety of purposes. It is used to determine the appropriate route for learners through a differentiated curriculum, to identify specific areas of difficulty or strength for a given learner and to test and certify language achievement. Assessment supports and improves learning by helping learners and teachers to identify next steps in the language teaching and learning process.
As well as varied teaching strategies, varied assessment strategies will support language learning and provide information that can be used as feedback so that teaching and learning activities can be modified in ways that best suit individual learners. By setting appropriate and engaging language tasks, asking higher order questions and giving feedback that promotes learner autonomy, assessment will support language learning and summarise achievement.
Assessment for certification in Leaving Certificate Lithuanian is based on the aims, objectives and learning outcomes of this specification. In any year, the learning outcomes to be assessed will constitute a sample of the outcomes from both strands.
The key skills of senior cycle are embedded in the learning outcomes and will be assessed in the context of the learning outcomes.
Assessment will focus on the ability to use language effectively with accuracy and fluency appropriate to the age and stage of learning*, on understanding Lithuanian as a linguistic system, on manipulating it for a range of communicative purposes, on the ability to develop their awareness as language users and their understanding of the interdependence of language and culture.
Reading and oral/ spoken stimulus materials used will represent a diverse range of standard variations of Lithuanian. Candidates will not be penalised for responding, orally or in writing, using one of the standard varieties of Lithuanian, even if it is different to that of the interlocutor/stimulus material.
Leaving Certificate Lithuanian will be assessed through three assessment components:
Each component will be administered and assessed by the State Examinations Commission (SEC). All components of assessment will reflect the integrated approach outlined in this specification.
There are two levels of examination, Ordinary level and Higher level, to which a differentiated allocation of marks will apply, as outlined below.
The different mark allocation applied to Ordinary and Higher levels is based on the understanding that for most language learners, the development of receptive skills outpaces the development of productive skills during the process of language learning. Therefore, a greater proportion of the marks are allocated to receptive tasks at Ordinary level and to productive and interactive tasks at Higher level.
The oral examination will assess language proficiency. It will focus, in part, on discussion about the Language Portfolio.
The oral examination will specifically assess learners’ ability to:
GENERAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: ORAL COMPONENT
Note for all levels: Learners may respond using another standard variety of the target languages which is different to that of the interlocutor.
The aural and written examination papers will consist of two components and be presented at Higher and Ordinary level.
GENERAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: AURAL COMPONENT
GENERAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: WRITTEN COMPONENT
* The specification is broadly aligned with A2/B1 of the CEFR.